חסר רכיב

Nature Reserve

Outsiders once referred to the kibbutz as a “nature reserve,” a term its members adopted with pride — a place that preserved its values, balanced spirit and material life, connected nature and culture, and served as an example to emulate.

“Ever since I can remember myself as a child and teenager living in Kibbutz Be’eri, and even today, whenever visitors come from outside, they look around in astonishment, hardly believing what they see, and exclaim: ‘A nature reserve!’ The nickname stuck to us… it became part of our collective pride. Our uniqueness was that we remained ‘a kibbutz of the old days’… But perhaps today this preservation binds us. Perhaps it has become a thin, deceptive shell, an outer appearance that no longer holds the inner life it once did. Are we all still ‘members’? ‘Partners’? Behind the houses, the huts, the sidewalks, the trees and lawns and public gardens, the streetlights and benches — does the core of the kibbutz our parents built still exist? And does it really need to be preserved?”
— Ziva Yellin
Ziva was born in Kibbutz Be’eri in the western Negev, where she has lived and created all her life.
Sophie Brison-Mackay arrived at the kibbutz as a child from the great metropolis of London and has since lived within two very different worlds. Both live in the same kibbutz and maintain an ongoing artistic dialogue, also working together as curators at Be’eri Gallery. Their lives are interwoven with the kibbutz’s internal nature and with the open landscape beyond the fence in the western Negev bordering Gaza. At times it is a green field with an endless horizon and the scent of harvest; in recent years, at times, it is burnt, black, and sorrowful.

Today, places like their kibbutz risk becoming nature reserves — islands of cultivated nature that are shrinking as the creature called the cooperative kibbutz survives mostly in very affluent communities, where there is “enough” for everyone. Be’eri is one of the few remaining cooperative kibbutzim, where members work together to sustain a shared economy and receive equal living conditions. The revolutionary communal idea, founded on aspirations for social justice, balance between material and spiritual life, and mutual responsibility within the community, seems to exist more on the surface than at the core.

Ziva works. Using old brown wrapping paper, she builds empty stage sets, shells of objects that are landscapes — fragments of the environments she grew up in: a bench and a streetlamp, a sprinkler on the lawn, a rock garden with a public flower bed (a joint work by both artists). The public landscape is painted in plain white wall paint on shutters and walls — the simplest material. Her studio embraces worn-out relics carrying the scent of fifty years past. Her paintings, lyrical and beautiful, rustle in the heart. Ask Ziva about the pothos plants and other artificial vegetation in her works, and she will tell you that today there is no need to struggle to grow nature; one can buy cheap, durable replicas that will not fade from too much or too little watering and will remain green forever.

The book About Looking, which Sophie has been reading recently, speaks of “…social institutions that, in the modern period, drained from humans their element of nature and thus confined them. Nature therefore came to mean everything that grows organically, everything not produced by human hands, the opposite of the artificial structures of human culture. At the same time, nature can be understood as that aspect within human interiority that remains natural, or at least marks a longing to be natural. From this point of view, the image of a wild animal becomes the starting point of a daydream, a point from which the dreamer eventually turns away.”
— John Berger, About Looking

Sophie dreams, photographs, and digitally treats animals and plants — any “nature” around her — from her English infancy, through her childhood in the kibbutz and its surroundings, to her life as a mother raising children in today’s kibbutz. She is interested in the dawn outside the house, nocturnal animals and camouflage, animals from the London Zoo, butterflies from here and there. Her starting point is a deep, black void one can sink into; into it she inserts carefully rendered fragments of animals, Israeli flora (irises, cyclamen, fig leaves), kibbutz ornamentals (bauhinia trees, bougainvillea, calla lilies — in Be’eri they used to plant callas in the front gardens), and familiar kibbutz still-life objects. Like Ziva, she isolates images: the streetlamp, the curtains of the culture hall, a brutalist-style bench. Sometimes they use the same visual elements that Sophie photographs, each for her own work. She assembles collages — small islands, stories of identity and place.

She is drawn to, and draws from, the worlds of natural history museums and zoos — both institutions born in the nineteenth century that declared themselves cultural institutions and sources of knowledge, though they were, to a large extent, showcases of imperial colonialism. In zoos, animals are kept within painted environments, their cages framing them like pictures; in museums, animals are dead, catalogued, displayed timelessly. In both, the controlling hand of humanity is evident. Why were these institutions created, along with this aesthetic? And when did humans and animals lose the balance in their relationship?

“In the modern period, humans became detached from nature; the relationship to animals changed, and they became raw materials, commodities. Zoos are where we go to look at animals… animals are disappearing everywhere… their presence in zoos is a monument to their disappearance.”
— John Berger

Berger speaks against the separation between life, nature, and art. Today, he argues, “culture proceeds parallel to nature and is entirely separated from it. Even the sight of nature itself has shrunk into a commodity to be consumed.” Sophie believes that the historical loss for which zoos stand as a monument is irreversible in a culture shaped by capitalism, yet she does not dwell nostalgically on the past. Instead, she wonders about “the composition, the mixture, the present identity of my kibbutz; about processes of constructing or dismantling identity; about closed communities and conservatism; about hybrid creatures and the beauty and promise embedded in them.”

It seems that Sophie arrived at the simple kibbutz, with its modest and common nature, through European eyes and aesthetics, photographing even the ordinary and the puddles of the open landscape around her in a heroic manner — with the gaze of a London immigrant: half enchanted, half clothing the ordinary in royal radiance.
“The kibbutz could exist in a completely separate solar system from London, and that would be reasonable to me. I live with these universes orbiting within me. The processes of integration and differentiation for immigrants are dynamic and lifelong. It is an ongoing dialogue between parts of your identity, and that dialogue never ends — that is its nature. It is fluid and dynamic. Mine takes place along the paths of the kibbutz.”
— Sophie Brison-Mackay

How does one create integration between the human inclination toward social life — perhaps toward social justice through equality and mutual responsibility (socialism) — and the inclination toward freedom, which ultimately gave rise to free competition, capitalism, and the reduction of human beings to equations of productivity, consumption, and utility? Both capitalism and socialism are products of the modern era. Perhaps humanity’s attitude toward animals, which today require preservation, foreshadows a future in which human culture, social structures, and even human communal life itself will require preservation.

As humanity developed, nature became increasingly cultivated. As humans became more utilitarian, nature paid the price.
Kibbutz nature is a hybrid: a human act of cultivation combined with a communal social model that always sought closeness to nature and truth. Kibbutz nature represented this ideal and, together with the value of labor, completed the secular “religion” of the kibbutz.
It is an intriguing hybrid.

Both Ziva and Sophie grow, from the personal and the private, branches of questions about nature and cultivation, and about the strange cooperative-capitalist way of life in which they live. Through kibbutz nature they ask: Is all this still alive? Perhaps on life support? Artificial? What still pulses with life, and what belongs to the past and is gone? Are they living the dream, or trapped in a “golden cage,” just before the kibbutz itself becomes a zoo — a place people come to see what no longer exists naturally, only as an exhibit of the past?

When IKEA sells plastic plants, kibbutz courtyards are covered with synthetic grass, and public buildings across the country are wrapped in artificial greenery, one may ask: what remains, a hundred years after its birth, of kibbutz nature and what it once symbolized?

P.S.
This is no longer just an internal kibbutz conversation. The capitalist world, the privatization of public institutions, the rising cost of living, the cost of housing, and the climate crisis compel all of us in this country to look again and seek new answers.
Anat Lidror
Curator of the exhibition
חסר רכיב